Rethinking the Criminology Curriculum

√

Authors

  • Daniel Williams Cardiff Metropolitan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70386/ijcpe.v1i1.47

Keywords:

criminology curriculum design, problem-based learning, challenge-based learning, inquiry-based learning, active learning, higher education andragogy

Abstract

This article reviews the evidence base for a range of contemporary, student-centred curriculum design methodologies, including inquiry-based learning (IBL), problem-based learning (PBL), project-based learning (PjBL), challenge-based learning (CBL), place-based learning and competency-based education (CBE), and considers their applicability to the design of a contemporary undergraduate criminology degree. Drawing on systematic reviews, meta-analyses and recent empirical literature, the article evaluates the theoretical underpinnings, andragogical benefits and structural limitations of each approach. It situates these findings within the requirements of the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Subject Benchmark Statement for Criminology (QAA, 2022), which explicitly positions research and critical enquiry as foundational to the discipline and calls for curriculum designs that embed equality, diversity and inclusion, education for sustainable development, and professional partnership. The article argues that no single methodology is sufficient on its own and that a principled hybrid model, drawing selectively on the strengths of each approach, offers the most coherent and evidence-informed basis for criminology curriculum design. Implications for degree revalidation, staff development, assessment design and partnership are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balloo, K., Pauli, R., Worrell, M. and Sherwood, D. (2024) ‘Balancing pedagogical innovation with psychological safety: student perceptions of authentic and traditional assessment’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), pp. 201–215. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2023.2275519.

Barron, B. and Darling-Hammond, L. (2008) ‘Teaching for meaningful learning: a review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning.’ In Darling-Hammond, L. et al. (eds) Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 11–70.

Benbouriche, M., Beaumont-Vachon, J., Bouchard, S. and Tardif, M. (2025) ‘Exploring students’ experiences in using virtual simulation and gamification principles for authentic learning and assessment in criminal psychology’, Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 35(3), pp. 315–335. doi: 10.1080/10511253.2024.2324179.

Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T. and Fischer, F. (2020) ‘Simulation-based learning in higher education: a meta-analysis’, Review of Educational Research, 90(4), pp. 499–541. doi: 10.3102/0034654320933544.

Doulougeri, K., van den Beemt, A., Giret, A., Membrillo-Hernandez, J. and Bots, M. (2024) ‘Challenge-based learning implementation in engineering education: a systematic literature review’, Journal of Engineering Education, 113(2), pp. 391–421. doi: 10.1002/jee.20588.

Gallagher, S.E. and Savage, T. (2023) Challenge-based learning in higher education: an exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), pp. 1–23. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354.

Georgiou, D., Gallagher, S.E. and Chmielewska, K.A. (2025) Beyond the challenge: exploring student, lecturer, and stakeholder challenges with challenge-based learning. Active Learning in Higher Education. doi: 10.1177/14697874251326099.

Harleni, H., Hartati, Y. and Syamsudin, A. (2025) Unveiling the impact of inquiry-based learning: a meta-analysis of student learning outcomes. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan. doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.7061.

Helker, K., Bruns, M., Reymen, I.M.M.J. and Vermunt, J.D. (2025) A framework for capturing student learning in challenge-based learning. Active Learning in Higher Education. doi: 10.1177/14697874241230459.

Holmboe, E.S., Batalden, P. and Wong, B.M. (2024) From competence by time to competence by design: lessons from a national transformation initiative. Academic Medicine, 99(4S). doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005620.

Hu, A., Liu, Q. and Daniel, B. (2025) ‘Digital technologies in authentic assessment in higher education: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis’, SAGE Open, 15(3). doi: 10.1177/21582440251357198.

Kakar, S. (2025) Enhancing criminology and criminal justice education through experiential learning: insights and implications. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 36(3). doi: 10.1080/10511253.2025.2506430.

Kozanitis, A. and Nenciovici, L. (2023) Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: a meta-analysis. Higher Education, 86(6), pp. 1377–1394. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8.

Leijon, M. et al. (2022) ‘Challenge based learning in higher education – A systematic literature review’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(5), pp. 609–618. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503.

Liu, Y. and Pásztor, A. (2022) Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: a meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101069. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069.

Ministry of Education, India (2020) National Education Policy 2020. New Delhi: Government of India. Available at: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf (Accessed: 20 April 2026).

Pantzos, P., Pears, A. and Buckley, J. (2025) ‘Analysing student motivation in challenge-based learning in higher engineering education using the Self-Determination Theory’, Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology, 1(1). doi: 10.63385/ipt.v1i1.45.

Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2022) Subject Benchmark Statement: Criminology. Gloucester: QAA. Available at: https://www.qaa.ac.uk (Accessed: 1 April 2026).

Rios, J.A. and Brewer, J. (2020) ‘Effect of a place-based learning community on belonging, persistence, and equity gaps for first-year STEM students.’ PLoS ONE, 15(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242187.

Rodriguez-Gomez, D., Pedersen, A.S. and Galdames-Calderon, M. (2024) ‘Systematic review: revisiting challenge-based learning teaching practices in higher education.’ Education Sciences, 14(9), 1008. doi: 10.3390/educsci14091008.

Rosário, A.T. and Raimundo, R. (2024) ‘Enhancing business higher education through simulation-based learning, problem-based learning, and challenge-based learning.’ Available at: https://wseas.com/journals/bae/2025/c345107-033(2025).pdf

Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2020) ‘Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, p. 101860. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.

Sam, R. (2024) Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 13, 1045. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.143627.1.

Trullàs, J.C., Blay, C., Sarri, E. and Pujol, R. (2022) Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 104. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8.

University of Glasgow (2024) Challenge-based learning: active learning resources hub. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Learning and Teaching. Available at: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/learningandteaching/activelearning/guides/challenge-based-learning/ (Accessed: 20 April 2026).

van den Beemt, A., van de Watering, G. and Bots, M. (2023) ‘Conceptualising variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: the CBL-compass.’ European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(1), pp. 24–41. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2022.2078181.

van den Beemt, A. et al. (2025) Examining the potential of in- and extra-curricular challenge-based learning in higher education: a delphi study. Research in Learning Technology, 32. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2024.2417798.

Wheebox (2022) India Skills Report 2022: Re-engineering education and skilling, building for the future of work. Gurugram: Wheebox Talent Assessments. Available at: https://wheebox.com/assets/pdf/ISR_Report_2022.pdf (Accessed: 20 April 2026).

Yu, L. and Zin, Z.M. (2023) The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of problem-based learning models: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1139987. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1139987.

Downloads

Published

30-10-2026

How to Cite

Williams, D. (2026). Rethinking the Criminology Curriculum: √. International Journal of Criminology and Policing Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.70386/ijcpe.v1i1.47

Issue

Section

Articles